Don't miss our newsletter. Please confirm your subscription now at the top of this email.
PATH FINANCIAL LLC
Registered Investment Advisor
1990 Main Street #750
Sarasota, FL 34236
941-350-7904
Raul Elizalde - Monday, August 8 2011
Today the S&P 500 went down 6.66%, or an astonishing 80 points from the close of the prior day. We saw this before. In fact, 20 times since 1971 the S&P dropped by more than 5% in a single day. What now?
The S&P went on to lose for a second day on only 5 of those 20 times. Only twice the S&P did not have a higher close within the following 5 trading days or the following two months. A short-term rebound, therefore, is not out of the question. At least there is a good case for stating that short-term support could form around today's close, at least judging from history.
Day change |
Next day change |
Highest following week |
Highest following two months |
|
10/16/1987 |
-5.2% |
-20.5% |
-8.6% |
-8.6% |
10/19/1987 |
-20.5% |
5.3% |
14.9% |
14.9% |
10/26/1987 |
-8.3% |
2.4% |
12.3% |
12.3% |
1/8/1988 |
-6.8% |
1.7% |
3.6% |
10.7% |
10/13/1989 |
-6.1% |
2.8% |
4.0% |
5.7% |
10/27/1997 |
-6.9% |
5.1% |
7.1% |
12.2% |
8/31/1998 |
-6.8% |
3.9% |
6.9% |
13.4% |
4/14/2000 |
-5.8% |
3.3% |
6.3% |
9.0% |
9/29/2008 |
-8.8% |
5.4% |
5.4% |
5.4% |
10/7/2008 |
-5.7% |
-1.1% |
0.7% |
1.0% |
10/9/2008 |
-7.6% |
-1.2% |
10.3% |
10.5% |
10/15/2008 |
-9.0% |
4.3% |
8.5% |
10.8% |
10/22/2008 |
-6.1% |
1.3% |
4.9% |
12.2% |
11/5/2008 |
-5.3% |
-5.0% |
-2.3% |
-1.9% |
11/6/2008 |
-5.0% |
2.9% |
2.9% |
3.3% |
11/12/2008 |
-5.2% |
6.9% |
6.9% |
9.7% |
11/19/2008 |
-6.1% |
-6.7% |
10.1% |
15.9% |
11/20/2008 |
-6.7% |
6.3% |
19.1% |
24.2% |
12/1/2008 |
-8.9% |
4.0% |
11.5% |
14.5% |
1/20/2009 |
-5.3% |
4.3% |
5.0% |
8.6% |
But a little digging reveals that the current rout (which we foresaw in our last newsletter, Markets and Politics, July 25) has less to do with a market blip, the Washington circus, or the downgrade by Standard and Poors, and much to do with the reading of the latest economic indicators.
In April, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released its first preliminary estimate of 1Q GDP at 1.8%. In May it released its second estimate at 1.8%, and in June it released a third, slightly up at 1.9%.
Then, on July 29, the bureau dropped a bomb: all those releases were way off. The actual number was a truly dismal 0.4%. This was followed by very weak PMI (Purchasing Managers Index) and NMI (Non-Manufacturing Index) releases. Adding insult to injury, the revelation that economic numbers were far weaker than anyone had been led to believe came at the same time as Congress pushed through a $2.7 trillion spending cut package. Combine a stalled economy with a massive austerity package and you have a pretty straightforward recipe for recession.
Equities, which depend on a growing economy to generate earnings, are in serious trouble. Projected earnings are likely to be overstated, making forward-looking P/E ratios higher than current calculations.
Under that light, the equity market rout can’t be seen as a buying opportunity until earnings projections are recalculated with the new understanding that the economy has virtually ground to a halt, and that a contractionary package passed by Congress is likely to set the economy in reverse.
From a technical perspective it is quite possible that the market will rebound somewhat in the next day or two, as we have seen. But unless the economy gets some good news soon, there is little reason to interpret the carnage of the last few days in any other way than a response to a fresh, more accurate view of economic activity, one that realizes that the economy is far weaker than what the consensus had been until just a few days ago.
Can a recession be avoided? Recessions are fought with fiscal or monetary stimuli. Fiscal stimulus is out of the question as far as we can tell: more spending or lower taxes have virtually no chance in Congress. That leaves monetary stimulus as the only tool left in the shed. And a blunt tool it is: rates are rock-bottom low, velocity of money has plummeted, and the Fed’s balance sheet is already huge. Still this is the only tool available, and we would not be surprised to see a new round of quantitative easing.
If the Fed decides to embark on QE3 then US Treasury bonds may well continue to rally despite the S&P downgrade. In fact this would have a neat political silver lining for the Administration – we reckon that the US Treasury would derive some pleasure at having its bonds going through the roof after being downgraded by what they see as a rogue agency.
A short-term bounce in equities, if it happens, has to be treated with caution. Some will be tempted to see it as a sign that today’s drop was overdone. More risk-averse investors may want to treat it instead as a gift: a golden opportunity to cut losses at a better level, or a welcome breathing room to lower the risk profile on their portfolios.
Doing this would prevent investors from participating in a strong, solid rebound and many analysts will insist on this. But as things stand right now, in our view at least, a bull market has little chance and no foundation.
-----------------------------------
We use quantitative measures to build and maintain portfolios for our clients, which we rebalance every quarter. We described our investment process in previous newsletters. If you would like to know more about how Path Financial’s investment process works, call us or send us an e-mail at the address below. We’ll be happy to set up a confidential meeting to discuss new paths to financial success.
Raul Elizalde | raul@pathfinancial.net | 941-350-7904
Don't miss our newsletter. Please confirm your subscription now at the top of this email.
©2011 Path Financial LLC
This communication contains general information that is not suitable for everyone. The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized advice on investments. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this website will come to pass. Investing in the stock market involves gains and losses and may not be suitable for all investors. Information presented herein is subject to change without notice and should not be considered as a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Path Financial LLC (”Path Financial”) is a registered investment adviser with its principal place of business in the State of Florida. Path Financial and its representatives are in compliance with the current registration requirements imposed upon registered investment advisers by those states in which Path Financial maintains clients. Path Financial may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. This communication is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its investment advisory services. Any subsequent, direct communication by Path Financial with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. For information pertaining to the registration status of Path Financial, please contact Path Financial or refer to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website (www.adviserinfo.sec.gov). For additional information about Path Financial, including fees and services, send for our disclosure statement as set forth on form ADV from Path Financial using the contact information herein. Please read the disclosure statement carefully before you invest or send money.
The Dynamic portfolio results presented here represent a hypothetical account created using Path Financial’s proprietary investment strategy and do not reflect the results of an actual Path Financial client account.There are no guarantees that Path Financial will achieve the results presented herein. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any investment will be profitable. Comparison of the Dynamic portfolio to the S&P 500 is for comparative purposes only. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the S&P 500 may be materially different from the volatility reflected by the performance of the Dynamic portfolio due to varying degrees of diversification and/or other factors. “Bond Aggr.” represents the Lehman Aggregate Bond Index, or Barclays Aggregate Bond Index.